In our last post we proposed that the normal, healthy emotional and intellectual development of adolescents would lead them to develop "Basic Human Empathy." We defined Basic Human Empathy as "The intellectual and emotional ability to feel the joy and pain of others who are not personally close to us." We also raised the questions of whether we as teachers could help in the development of Basic Human Empathy and how we could do so.
We will now try to explore what factors intervene to thwart the normal development of Basic Human Empathy. Two such factors are: (1) cultural conditioning, and (2) individual, personal conditioning.
(1) By "cultural conditioning" we mean the sum total of the conditioned learning provided by the culture or sub-culture in which we live, injected unconsciously into our minds through associative learning. Some sub-cultures glorify individualism and denigrate (at least in practice) normal human concern for others. In the USA, for instance, there is a profound theological / philosophical under-current among some religious groups which minimizes the value of empathy as it glorifies an emphasis on individualism. This under-current is sometimes mistakenly referred to as "the Protestant ethic." This is an unwarranted term, as most major Protestant denominations do not subscribe to it. More accurate terms are "the Puritan ethic," or "the Calvinist ethic."
As dogmatic practitioners of strict Calvinism, the Puritan settlers in what would become the United States of America believed that their God had already predestined all human beings to either eternal heaven or hell, and that the human experience on earth correlated to this divine judgment. The "saved" would enjoy riches and benefits on earth; the "condemned" would not -- they would experience want and despair.
While this "Puritan ethic" is not always consciously embraced in American culture, it has undoubtedly had a major impact on the ethos of American culture due to the importance of the Puritans in the American story. It is an under-current that pervades many sectors of secular culture (such as the business world) and is predominant in some religious subcultures.
The practical effect of the conscious or unconscious spread of this Puritan ethic is the logical conclusion that (having accepted the predestination premise,) if God has condemned the unworthy person to hell for his/her iniquity, why should I care about his/her well-being on earth? Thus, the poor are condemned for their poverty, the weak for their own powerlessness, and the sick for their sickness. The Puritan ethic blesses our indifference and our lack of caring. It undermines the normal development of Basic Human Empathy.
We must stress that many or most Protestant denominations -- among them Lutherans, Methodists, Anglicans and many others -- do not subscribe to this theology or its consequent social doctrine of non-empathy. Neither does the Catholic church, whose social doctrine is among the most empathetic of all, even if most Catholics are blissfully unaware of their own church's social teaching.
Due to its historical importance as a foundation stone of American culture, the Puritan ethic has created a powerful under-current of insensitivity in American society -- even among members of religious groups that do not support the Puritan theological premise or conclusions.
Other nations and cultures have their own historical and philosophical barriers that interfere with the development of Basic Human Empathy. We each need to explore our cultural and historical contexts in order to identify what variables are at play.
(2) Individual, personal conditioning often builds on cultural conditioning. Continuing the USA example, wave upon wave of immigrants struggle in the "land of opportunity" to reach the "American dream." Those who reach the dream of material welfare, unaware (and uninterested) in the real difficulties faced by others, often assume that if others haven't found the same level of material success it must be due to their lack of trying, some moral failing, or some other internal weakness.
The adults in American society who hold such views may intentionally or unintentionally condition their children to believe that if others suffer, it must be due to their own avoidable failings, or lack of hard work. Didn't they, recent immigrants, reach success through hard work? Therefore, why waste time, energy and money worrying about the downtrodden?
We can now explain how, in the richest large country in the world, we accept homelessness, poverty, lack of access to health care or legal care, etc. and do not appear to be particularly motivated to take political steps to bring about greater social justice.
Often, adolescents reach our schools carrying the huge burden of non-empathetic cultural and personal conditioning. This conditioning has been unconscious and not requested. They usually have not stopped to reflect on their own mental schemas about empathy, economic success, and how pain and suffering can come to those who do not deserve it. That is the beginning of our work as teachers.
In our next post, we will explore some specific avenues to help our students breakaway from any residual cultural or personal conditioning and recover their potential for development of Basic Human Empathy.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
First of all, I must point out the shortcomings of this post. You stated that “even if most Catholics are blissfully unaware of their own church’s teaching.” The first thought that came to mind as soon as I read this was the saying “ignorance is bliss” and upon further analysis, this is what was meant. The only difference was that you used the word unaware instead of ignorant. (Ignorant being a synonym of unaware) This can be interrupted as an attack towards the Catholic church and throws away some of the credibility of the author of this post because there was no need for this in a post about empathy and leads to distortion of the intended message.
ReplyDeleteAlso, you said that “We can now explain how, in the richest large country in the world, we accept homelessness, poverty, lack of access to health care or legal care, etc. and do not appear to be particularly motivated to take political steps to bring about greater social justice.” To begin, there is no such thing as legal care so it is impossible to provide it. Unless you meant that everyone has to be provided an attorney, which does exist. You also provide misleading information by saying that poverty and homelessness is accepted in the United States. This is a flat out lie. There are many programs nationwide that were created to combat this grave problem but there just isn’t enough resources to provide immediate relief to every person. Also, there are many non-profit organizations that were created to help solve this problem locally, nationally, and globally. The reason homelessness and poverty is still a problem(and will always be a problem) is because once one person escapes this problem, someone else falls into it. Saying that we accept lack of access to health care is extremely misleading. Health care is available to many (excluding people with pre existing conditions but this problem is currently being solved in congress) but it is too expensive to afford and even if the government was to greatly reduce the price, the cost might be too great for some family’s to afford causing poverty to worsen.
Furthermore, you said that “Often, adolescents reach our schools carrying the huge burden of non-empathetic cultural and personal conditioning.” I do not understand how this is a burden. It is more of a burden to concern yourself with the well being others and make the attempt to help them. Also, this conditioning is more or less necessary to survive in the United States. There is a cost to almost everything you do, and that cost is always rising. If you get too caught up with helping others you will be left behind and fall into ruin. Only those who are completely established (by this I mean that they are financially secure, and mentally/emotionally stable) have the liberty to help others.
(1 of 2)
What’s more, you have succeeded in demonizing individualism by implying that it is the key component of “the Puritan ethic.” I also fail to comprehend how the theology of the Puritans(Puritans only covered a few colonies) could have been maintained for so long and spread to the rest of the nation.(Some states being adding to the US decades later) Also, the Declaration of Independence (which is what established the foundation of America) contradicts the Puritan concept that god condemns people to hell by stating that “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” (This is a famous quote that is taught in many American classrooms)
ReplyDeleteMoreover, I do not believe that basic human empathy exists. It is something that someone either has or doesn’t. It cannot be taught, and the reason for this is that empathy is a social behavior. If it was possible to change social behaviors then autism would not be a problem. Although social behaviors could be imitated to an extent, that is only accomplishes the intellectual component of your basic human empathy. If the person isn’t emotionally empathetic then the “basic human empathy” they show is just a imitation of the behavior that is done to fit in with peers or with society, but in doing this they may become a “humant” which is something that is not wanted.
(2 of 2)
Check it out and post a coment :)
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/berenyss